Call For Members On Reviewers Board / Associate Editors
+ Peer Review – An Introductory Approach
Who are Reviewers?
Types of Peer Reviews
Purpose of Peer Review
On Being Asked To Review
Conducting the Review
Communicating Report to Editor
Why Reviewers Review?
+ Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Promptness
Confidentiality
Standards of Objectivity
Acknowledgement of Sources
Disclosure & Conflict of Interest
Adherence to our Publishing Ethics
+ Process To Referee An Article
Why Referee?
Guidelines
Instruction To Use 'Software' For Review
+ Process Flow Chart
A Brief
Review Process
Editorial & Publishing Process
+ Reviewers Guidelines
Principles of Review Process
Conflicts of Interest
Comments for Author
Communication 'Review' to Author
+ Publishing Guidelines
Publishing Quality Contents
How to Get Published?
Publishing Timeframe
Manuscript Submission Guidelines
Contributor Agreement, Copyright & Permissions
What Next After Acceptance?
Promote Your Work
Increasing Citation & Improving Impact Factor
Making Most of Editorial Board
Working with Reviewers
New Journal Proposals
Publication Ethics Kit
Different 'Form Letters'
Best Practices in Publishing Guidelines
Guidelines in Making Decisions about Different Ethical Misconduct Activities & Issues
Committee on Publication Ethics (PDFs)
Useful Links / Resources
Activity Charts Brief
Activity Chart – Print Publication
Activity Chart – Online Publication
Manuscript Reviewers Checklist
+ Advice to Reviewers
Editor's Advice to Reviewers
Listening to Reviewers
Reviewers Quick Guide To Common Statistical Errors In Scientific Papers